Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cotyledon excision at the late cotyledonary stage significantly increased plantlet development frequency.

A claim from Plant development from microspore-derived embryos in oilseed rape as affected by chilling, desiccation and cotyledon excision · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotyledon excision at the late cotyledonary stage significantly increased plantlet development frequency.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
late cotyledonary stagee0
Treatment
Cutting the cotyledonse0
Outcome
frequency of plantlet developmente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cutting the cotyledons of the embryos at late cotyledonary stage significantly increased the frequency of plantlet development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–777
t0

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65

Title

Plant development from microspore-derived embryos in oilseed rape as affected by chilling, desiccation and cotyledon excision

G. Q. Zhang; D. Q. Zhang; G. X. Tang; et al. Biologia Plantarum 2006. doi:10.1007/s10535-006-0004-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d0fb047bb603581c6e3b4520fc3b87ad502779b77c9d340e918197c81737f31e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pruning · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.