Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct seeding lowered seed cotton yields relative to conventional tillage by 2% to 25% across sites.

A claim from Limited yield penalties in an early transition to conservation agriculture in cotton-based cropping systems of Benin · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding lowered seed cotton yields relative to conventional tillage by 2% to 25% across sites.

Treatment
direct seedinge0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
degraded soils (2% to 25%)e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At all sites, direct seeding led to lower below-ground biomass growth and seed cotton yields compared with conventional tillage in an early transition to conservation agriculture starting from degraded soils (2% to 25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1544

Title

Limited yield penalties in an early transition to conservation agriculture in cotton-based cropping systems of Benin

Pierrot Lionel Yemadje; O'Neil Takpa; Isidore Amonmide; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2022. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.1041399

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d250495f3ec5e5cf22f19c938fe47c4f7e9425709f9f3ed53766d041457a283f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

transplanting · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.