Claim · model-written summary
Bed formation had a lower gross margin than the other tillage treatments.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- BPe1
- Outcome
- gross margine0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- other tillage treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gross margin was lower compared to other tillage treatments”
e1“BP showed the lowest benefit-cost ratio due to higher input cost as well as gross margin was lower compared to other tillage treatments.”
t0“Rice”
Title
Evaluation of Direct Seeded Rice Planter under Minimum Tillage Practices
AKMS Islam; MM Hossain; MA Saleque The Agriculturists 2014. doi:10.3329/agric.v11i2.17493
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage saved 25-46% fuel versus conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage could save 27-48% land preparation cost versus conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage options did not affect rice seedling emergence.
- Method / resource The seed meter dispensed rice seed at the actual seed rate.
- Method / resource The flute type meter did not break seeds.
- Intervention effect Rice yields did not differ significantly among tillage treatments.
- Observation Bed formation had the lowest benefit-cost ratio due to higher input cost.
- Observation Strip tillage performed better than the other two minimum tillage methods.
- Method / resource The planter reduced seeding time, fuel and labour costs versus the conventional method.
- Recommendation The authors recommend minimum tillage for dry seeded rice in High Barind Tract.