Claim · model-written summary
PD₂ under Irr₂ used 18% less water than PD₁.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- PD₂ under Irr₂e0
- Outcome
- watere0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 18%e0
- Comparator
- PD₁e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PD₂ under Irr₂ achieved 94% of PD₁’s yield with 18% less water”
e1“winter wheat productivity”
Title
Mitigate Environmental Stress and Enhance Crop Productivity
Rania S. Shehata; Hanan Moawad; Hanan Z. Amer; et al. Biotechnology Journal International 2025. doi:10.9734/bji/2025/v29i3780
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Early sowing with full irrigation maximized wheat grain yield at 6.8 tons/ha.
- Intervention effect Early sowing with full irrigation maximized wheat 1000-grain weight at 49.3 g.
- Observation Early sowing with full irrigation required the highest applied water, 5,608 m³/ha.
- Intervention effect Late planting with reduced irrigation conserved water at 3,282 m³/ha.
- Intervention effect Late planting with reduced irrigation incurred a wheat grain yield penalty, reaching 4.6 t/ha.
- Intervention effect PD₂ under Irr₂ reached 94% of PD₁ wheat yield.
- Intervention effect Water-saving strategies improved wheat water productivity.
- Intervention effect PD₃Irr₃ gave the highest wheat water productivity, 1.41 kg/m³.
- Recommendation The authors conclude mid-November planting is more suitable for yield than maximal irrigation.