Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cassava-bean intercropping decreased the amount of weeds compared with weeds in monocrops.

A claim from Evaluation of weed control in a cassava-bean intercropping system. · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava-bean intercropping decreased the amount of weeds compared with weeds in monocrops.

Treatment
intercropping combinationse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
amount of weedse2
Direction
decreasee2
Comparator
monocropse2
Setting
Quivicán, La Habana, Cubae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research was carried out at the Liliana Dimitrova Horticultural Research Institute, located in Quivicán, La Habana, Cuba.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126
e1

“Cassava genotypes (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were combined in order to determine the efficiency of these combinations for weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–301
e2

“Results showed a decrease in the amount of weeds in the different intercropping combinations, as compared to weeds in monocrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–759

Title

Evaluation of weed control in a cassava-bean intercropping system.

Adrián Hernández; René Ramos; Jesús Sánchez; et al. Investigative News in Education (Universidad de Costa Rica) 2015. doi:10.15517/am.v10i1.19451

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-d44b5d03e9379f7e49f256cd5cb49801cb9bef0c37076d54fb6ef29746152a3e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

intercropping · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.