Intervention effectmodel-written summary

125% RDF plus 5 t FYM significantly increased baby cob, baby corn and green fodder over 100% and 125% RDF, with parity to 100% RDF plus FYM.

A claim from Effect of sowing schedule and integrated nutrient management on productivity, profitability and soil health in rainfed baby corn (Zea mays)–horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) cropping sequence · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF plus 5 t FYM significantly increased baby cob, baby corn and green fodder over 100% and 125% RDF, with parity to 100% RDF plus FYM.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
125% RDF + 5 t FYMe0
Outcome
baby cob, baby corn, green foddere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at par with that obtained with 100% RDF + 5 t FYMe0
Comparator
100% RDF and125% RDFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“Further, application of 125% RDF + 5 t FYM significantly increased the baby cob, baby corn, green fodder, horse gram yield over 100% RDF and125% RDF, but was at par with that obtained with 100% RDF + 5 t FYM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1333

Title

Effect of sowing schedule and integrated nutrient management on productivity, profitability and soil health in rainfed baby corn (Zea mays)–horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) cropping sequence

A.K. SINHA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i4.5544

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-d5e8d76d7b794524bff3a5bfc81f4a3e78fd00c65d4bdd7e8c09387ac70a1723 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

153 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.