Claim · model-written summary
More frequent weed control did not guarantee greater economic benefits.
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- weed control inputs or frequencye0
- Outcome
- economic benefitse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increase in weed control inputs or frequency did not guarantee an increase in economic benefits.”
t0“Cowpea”
Title
Economics of Weed Management Methods as Influenced by Row-Spacing in Cowpea
O. Adewale Osipitan; I. Yahaya; Joseph A. Adigun Journal of Agricultural Science 2018. doi:10.5539/jas.v10n2p98
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Cowpea variable cultivation cost was substantially influenced by weed control cost.
- Intervention effect One hand-weeding input cost more than one PRE-herbicide input.
- Intervention effect Three hand weedings did not necessarily give the highest cowpea yield.
- Intervention effect Three hand weedings increased variable weed-control cost.
- Intervention effect PRE-herbicide combined with hand weeding gave the highest cowpea yield.
- Intervention effect PRE-herbicide combined with hand weeding gave the highest gross profit.
- Intervention effect PRE-herbicide alone gave the highest benefit-cost ratio.
- Association Cowpea row spacing mostly did not affect economic differences among weed-management methods.
- Association Economic benefits generally declined as cowpea row spacing increased.
- Recommendation The authors recommend minimizing hand weeding with PRE-herbicide, especially at narrow cowpea row spacing, to optimize yield and profit.