Claim · model-written summary
Foliage allocation coefficient did not vary significantly with tree size.
- Taxon
- Elmt0
- Material
- size of treese0
- Outcome
- biomass allocation coefficient of foliagee0
- Direction
- did not produce significant effecte0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The size of trees did not produce significant effect on the biomass allocation coefficient of foliage (BACf).”
t0“Elm (Ulmus Wallichiana Planch)”
Title
Biomass Allocation and Carbon Stock in Elm (Ulmus Wallichiana Planch) Plantation
Shabir Rather; K.N. Qaisar; Sabeena Nabi; et al. Current World Environment 2017. doi:10.12944/cwe.12.2.17
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Association Tree growth measures increased with diameter class.
- Association Component biomass increased significantly with diameter.
- Association Total biomass was highest under D4 at 475.54 kg/tree fresh.
- Association Carbon stock increased to 148.59 kg/tree under D4.
- Association Carbon dioxide equivalent increased to 543.82 kg/tree under D4.
- Association Branch and root allocation coefficients were higher in smaller diameter classes.
- Association Growth efficiency of components did not differ significantly by diameter.