Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Gypsum at 10 Mg fed-1 or the three-amendment interaction significantly increased sugar beet root and top yields.

A claim from EFFECT OF GYPSUM, SUGAR FACTORY LIME AND MOLAS ON SOME SOIL PROPRIETIES AND PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET(Beta vulgaris l.) GROWN ON SALINE-SODIC SOILS OF NILE NORTH DELTA · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum at 10 Mg fed-1 or the three-amendment interaction significantly increased sugar beet root and top yields.

Treatment
gypsum up to 10 Mg fed-1e0
Outcome
Roots , the top yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both growing seasonse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roots , the top yields of sugar beet, sucrose (%) and extractable sugar yield were high significantly increased with application of gypsum up to 10 Mg fed-1 and/or with the interaction between all amendments during both growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2320

Title

EFFECT OF GYPSUM, SUGAR FACTORY LIME AND MOLAS ON SOME SOIL PROPRIETIES AND PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET(Beta vulgaris l.) GROWN ON SALINE-SODIC SOILS OF NILE NORTH DELTA

M. Amer Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2015. doi:10.21608/jssae.2015.42170

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-daedd0d6a4370fa3b2721b12634519615f71b29a04633eb89a96bd9d997f1f99 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

lime · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.