Claim · model-written summary
Wild proso millet was the stronger competitor at 24/18 C.
- Taxon
- wild proso millete0
- Interactor
- Texas panicume1weed
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Qualifier
- 24/18 Ce0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“wild proso millet was superior at 24/18 C”
e1“When the two species were grown together, Texas panicum was the superior competitor at 30/24 C while wild proso millet was superior at 24/18 C.”
Title
David T. Patterson; Ann E. Russell; David A. Mortensen; et al. Weed Science 1986. doi:10.1017/s004317450006803x
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Both grasses produced more tillers, leaf area and dry weight at 30/24 C than 24/18 C.
- Observation Texas panicum accumulated more dry matter than wild proso millet at 30/24 C.
- Observation Wild proso millet accumulated more dry matter than Texas panicum at 24/18 C.
- Observation Texas panicum was the stronger competitor at 30/24 C.
- Intervention effect Short photoperiods accelerated flowering in both species.
- Intervention effect Short photoperiods limited vegetative growth in both species.
- Observation Wild proso millet flowered earlier than Texas panicum across photoperiods of 10 to 16 h.
- Observation Wild proso millet produced less vegetative growth than Texas panicum.
- Observation Authors infer wild proso millet would be competitively inferior in the southern United States.