Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application in F2 significantly increased maize yield by 26.0% in the first period.
- Treatment
- nitrogen application in F2e3
- Outcome
- MYe3
- Direction
- significant increasee3
- Value
- 26.0%e3
- Qualifier
- first periode3
- Comparator
- 0 (F1)e2
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize production technology”
e2“N fertilization rate – 0 (F1), 180 (F2) and 240 kg N ha-1 (F3)”
e3“Similarly, nitrogen application in F2 and F3 caused significant increase in MY by 26.0% and 33.3% in the first period and 23.1% and 27.4% in the 2015-2024 period”
Title
Adjusment of maize production technology to variable climate parameters
Simic, Milena; Dragičević, Vesna; Tolimir, Miodrag; et al. RIK (Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje (Belgrade, Serbia)) 2025
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage (RT) gave 7.8% higher maize yield than no-tillage (NT) in 2005-2014.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage (CT) gave 16.0% higher maize yield than no-tillage (NT) in 2005-2014.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage (RT) gave 11.6% higher maize yield than no-tillage (NT) in the second period.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage (CT) gave 23.0% higher maize yield than no-tillage (NT) in the second period.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application in F3 significantly increased maize yield by 33.3% in the first period.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application in F2 significantly increased maize yield by 23.1% in the 2015-2024 period.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application in F3 significantly increased maize yield by 27.4% in the 2015-2024 period.
- Observation Maize yield was higher in the first ten-year period than in the second, by 34.7%.
- Intervention effect Irrigation increased maize yield from 8.3 to 11.1 t/ha in the first period compared with rainfall conditions.
- Intervention effect Irrigation increased maize yield from 7.2 to 9.7 t/ha in the second period compared with rainfall conditions.
- Observation No-tillage (NT) has extremely high maize yield potential, but only when all environmental conditions are extremely favorable.
- Association In less favorable growing conditions, maize yield under RT and CT decreases gradually.
- Association In less favorable growing conditions, differences between rainfall and irrigation yields increase for RT and CT.
- Recommendation Conventional tillage (CT) is more convenient for maize yield in the agroecological conditions of Zemun Polje.