Claim · model-written summary
Oospores were absent in Cucurbita pepo.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepoe0 - Material
- Arlika, Beirutie0
- Outcome
- not in Cucurbita pepoe0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but not in Cucurbita pepo (cv. Arlika, Beiruti)”
Title
Y. Cohen; A. E. Rubin; M. Galperin Plant Disease 2011. doi:10.1094/pdis-02-11-0127
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation Single old or new pathotype isolates produced no oospores on detached cucurbit leaves.
- Observation Mixed isolate pairs produced abundant oospores in cucurbit mesophyll within 6 to 11 days.
- Observation Oospores formed at 12.5°C.
- Observation Oospores did not form at 25°C.
- Observation Oospores developed on intact plants under saturated humidity at 15 or 20°C.
- Observation Oospores were round, brown and approximately 40 μm across.
- Observation Oospores were produced in Cucumis sativum.
- Observation Oospores were produced in Cucumis melo.
- Observation Oospores were absent in C. moschata.
- Observation Oospores were absent in C. maxima.
- Observation Oospore inoculum caused sporulating downy mildew lesions in Cucumis sativum.
- Observation Oospore inoculum caused sporulating downy mildew lesions in Cucumis melo.
- Observation Oospore inoculum caused sporulating downy mildew lesions in C. moschata.
- Observation Oospore inoculum did not produce lesions in C. pepo.
- Observation Oospore inoculum did not produce lesions in C. maxima.
- Observation Molecular and fungicide analyses confirmed recombinant F1 offspring.
- Observation Some F1 progeny lost pathogenicity to C. moschata or C. maxima.
- Observation Other F1 progeny gained pathogenicity to Luffa cylindrica or Citrullus lanatus.
- Observation F1 progeny showed altered fungicide sensitivity or host range relative to parents.