Claim · model-written summary
Narrow peanut rows improved browntop millet control over wide rows.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- narrow-rowe0
- Interactor
- Browntop millete1weed
- Outcome
- Browntop millet controle1
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- wide-row peanute0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“control was greater in narrow-row compared to wide-row peanut”
e1“Browntop millet control was 98 to 100%”
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
Title
Weed Management in Evenly-Spaced 38- vs. 76-cm Row Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
D. O. Stephenson; B. J. Brecke Peanut Science 2011. doi:10.3146/ps10-4.1
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Narrower peanut rows increased Benghal dayflower control.
- Intervention effect Paraquat plus bentazon followed by imazapic, imazethapyr or chlorimuron controlled Benghal dayflower by at least 90%.
- Intervention effect Imazapic EPOST with or without 2,4-DB MPOST controlled Benghal dayflower by 98 to 100%.
- Intervention effect Preemergence diclosulam or flumioxazin sequences did not improve Benghal dayflower control compared with imazapic treatments.
- Intervention effect Imazapic or imazethapyr EPOST controlled browntop millet by 98 to 100%.
- Intervention effect All herbicide treatments controlled pitted morningglory by at least 90%.
- Intervention effect Peanut row spacing did not influence pitted morningglory control.
- Intervention effect Only treatments containing imazapic EPOST controlled sicklepod by at least 90%.
- Intervention effect Sicklepod control did not differ between peanut row spacings.
- Intervention effect Narrow row peanut yielded more than wide row peanut.
- Intervention effect Peanut yield differed little among herbicide treatments.
- Intervention effect All herbicide treatments gave greater peanut yields than the nontreated control.