Claim · model-written summary
Net income was significantly higher with sprinkler than canal irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- sprinkler irrigationt0
- Outcome
- net incomee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 84156.54/hae0
- Qualifier
- Rs. 44008.43/hae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net income was significantly higher (Rs. 84156.54/ha vs. Rs. 44008.43/ha)”
t0“sprinkler irrigation for sustainable groundnut cultivation”
Title
Kumari Vandana; Yogi Vikram; R K Yogi; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.7892
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Sprinkler irrigation reduced water consumption by 37.11% versus canal irrigation.
- Intervention effect Sprinkler irrigation increased groundnut yield by 7.98%.
- Observation Sprinkler fields used 202.86 kg/ha seed, exceeding the recommended 110-125 kg/ha.
- Observation Excessive seed rates were also observed under canal irrigation.
- Association The unnecessary seed input raised seed costs.
- Association Variable costs were higher with sprinkler than canal irrigation.
- Association Education significantly influenced sprinkler adoption; educated farmers were four times more likely to adopt.
- Association Access to credit significantly influenced sprinkler adoption.
- Association Farm size significantly influenced sprinkler adoption.
- Observation High initial investment costs remained a barrier to sprinkler adoption.
- Recommendation The authors recommend improved credit access and PMKSY subsidy awareness to promote sprinkler irrigation.