Claim · model-written summary
No RAPD polymorphism was detected among the named Pinot noir clones.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“No polymorphism was detected among known clones of Chardonnay (Ch. clone 7, Ch. clone 78 and Ch. Geneva clone) or Pinot noir (P. n. clone 29, P. n. Geneva clone and P. n. Pernand).”
Title
Analysis of the relationship between grapevine cultivars, sports and clones via DNA fingerprinting
Ye, G. N.; Soylemezoglu, G.; Soylemezoglu, G.; et al. Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut) 2015. doi:10.5073/vitis.1998.37.33-38
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Method / resource The 53 primers generated 464 bands, 29% shared by all tested genotypes.
- Method / resource Cluster analysis placed tested cultivars into Vitis vinifera and V. x Labruscana groups.
- Observation No RAPD polymorphism was detected among the named Chardonnay clones.
- Observation Pinot Meunier, Pinot gris and Gamay Beaujolais patterns were indistinguishable from Pinot noir.
- Observation Auxerrois and Melon had unique patterns and may be distinct cultivars.
- Observation Chardonnay clone 7 shared 84% of bands with Pinot noir.
- Observation Niagara and two supposed sports had over 97% RAPD amplicon homology.
- Observation Concord and a red-fruited sport had over 97% RAPD amplicon homology.
- Observation RAPD evidence argues against classifying the three sports as distinct cultivars.
- Method / resource RAPD patterns distinguished phenotypically similar cultivars and assessed supposed sport origins, although they did not distinguish known clones.