Claim · model-written summary
The NA1 variation was attributed to non wild type isolates.
- Taxon
- Rhododendron
Rhododendrone1 - Interactor
- Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorumt0pathogen - Outcome
- variabilitye0
- Qualifier
- presence of non‐wild type (nwt) isolatese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The variability in the NA1 lineage was due to the presence of non‐wild type (nwt) isolates.”
e1“aggressiveness on detached Rhododendron leaves”
t0“Phytophthora ramorum”
Title
Phenotypic differences among three clonal lineages of Phytophthora ramorum
M. Elliott; G. Sumampong; A. Varga; et al. Forest Pathology 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00627.x
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Observation NA2 and EU1 Phytophthora ramorum isolates were most aggressive on detached Rhododendron leaves, while NA1 isolates were least aggressive.
- Observation NA1 isolates varied most in aggressiveness and growth rate.
- Observation Growth rates did not differ significantly among wild type NA1, NA2 and EU1 lineages at tested temperatures.