Claim · model-written summary
TR tree community Shannon diversity was 4.79, significantly different from BK.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“BK plot indicates H’ value of 4.42 (H’max= 5.26) while the TR plot shows H’ value of 4.79 (Hmax= 5.44), of which the values were different significantly (P<0.05)”
t0“tree communities”
Title
M. S. Nizam; St. Rohani; W. A. Wan Juliana 2012
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation The two plots contained 2091 trees with diameter at breast height of at least 5.0 cm.
- Observation The BK plot contained 1091 trees.
- Observation The TR plot contained 1000 trees.
- Observation BK had 45 tree families, 110 genera and 199 species.
- Observation BK had 110 tree genera.
- Observation BK had 199 tree species.
- Observation TR had 232 tree species.
- Observation TR had 133 tree genera.
- Observation TR had 50 tree families.
- Observation Across both plots there were 322 species.
- Observation Across both plots there were 161 genera.
- Observation Across both plots there were 54 families.
- Observation Euphorbiaceae was the most species-rich family in BK, with 30 species.
- Observation Euphorbiaceae was the most species-rich family in TR, with 27 species.
- Observation Streblus ilicifolius dominated BK with an importance value index of 19.18%.
- Observation Intsia palembanica dominated TR with an importance value index of 14.58%.
- Observation BK tree basal area was 26.91 m2/ha.
- Observation TR tree basal area was 29.23 m2/ha.
- Observation BK tree community Shannon diversity was 4.42.