Claim · model-written summary
AWD methane emission factor was 1.67 kg ha−1 day−1, below CF.
- Treatment
- AWDe0
- Outcome
- CH4 emission factore0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 1.67 kg ha−1 day−1e0
- Qualifier
- 2.33 kg ha−1 day−1e0
- Comparator
- CFe0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Verbatim
e0“The CH4 emission factor for AWD was lower (1.67 kg ha−1 day−1) compared to CF (2.33 kg ha−1 day−1)”
Title
S.M. Mofijul Islam; Yam Kanta Gaihre; Md. Rafiqul Islam; et al. Journal of Environmental Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114520
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Association Fertilizer and irrigation interacted significantly for methane emissions.
- Association Fertilizer and irrigation interacted significantly for nitrous oxide emissions.
- Intervention effect PU reduced methane emissions by 6% against IPNS under AWD.
- Intervention effect PU reduced nitrous oxide emissions by 20% against IPNS under AWD.
- Intervention effect PU and IPNS produced similar emissions under CF.
- Intervention effect UDP reduced CH4 by 9% relative to PU under AWD.
- Intervention effect UDP reduced CH4 by 15% relative to IPNS under AWD.
- Intervention effect UDP reduced CH4 by 9% relative to PU under CF.
- Intervention effect UDP reduced CH4 by 11% relative to IPNS under CF.
- Intervention effect AWD reduced cumulative CH4 by 28% versus CF.
- Intervention effect AWD reduced GHG intensity by 26% versus CF.
- Intervention effect AWD caused no significant rice yield loss versus CF.
- Intervention effect AWD increased N2O emissions by 73% versus CF.
- Intervention effect AWD reduced total global warming potential by 27% versus CF.
- Intervention effect UDP increased rice yield by 21% versus PU.
- Intervention effect UDP increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 58% versus PU.
- Recommendation Authors suggested UDP as a carbon-friendly technology.
- Recommendation Authors suggested AWD irrigation as a carbon-friendly technology.