Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All practices with fertilizer increased maize grain yield, with minimal statistical significance in some cases.

A claim from Conservation Farming and Changing Climate: More Beneficial than Conventional Methods for Degraded Ugandan Soils · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All practices with fertilizer increased maize grain yield, with minimal statistical significance in some cases.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
in combination with fertilizere2
Outcome
grain yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
albeit with minimal statistical significance in some casese2
Comparator
conventionale2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study evaluated the extent of bare grounds in Nakasongola, one of the districts in the Cattle Corridor of Uganda and the yield responses of maize (Zea mays) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to different tillage methods in the district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–594
e2

“All practices, whether conventional or the newly introduced conservation farming practices in combination with fertilizer increased bean and maize grain yields, albeit with minimal statistical significance in some cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1376

Title

Conservation Farming and Changing Climate: More Beneficial than Conventional Methods for Degraded Ugandan Soils

Drake Mubiru; Jalia Namakula; James Lwasa; et al. Sustainability 2017. doi:10.3390/su9071084

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e05b03f6d74b46825b41b34e27d855995d923ebb8faebb1d785e4af096ddb88a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.