Claim · model-written summary
In Batoufam, Fabaceae was an important family (28.47%).
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“At Batoufam, the most important families are Phyllanthaceae (39.73%), Fabaceae (28.47%), Araliaceae (23.77%)”
Title
Nicole Liliane Maffo Maffo; Hubert Kpoumie Mounmemi; Hermann Taedoumg; et al. Open Journal of Forestry 2025. doi:10.4236/ojf.2025.151005
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation The Bandrefam sacred forest inventory identified 65 species.
- Observation The Batoufam sacred forest inventory identified 45 species.
- Observation In Bandrefam, Phyllanthaceae was the most important family (53.98%).
- Observation In Bandrefam, Moraceae was an important family (21.69%).
- Observation In Bandrefam, Lamiaceae was an important family (20.15%).
- Observation In Batoufam, Phyllanthaceae was the most important family (39.73%).
- Observation In Batoufam, Araliaceae was an important family (23.77%).
- Observation In Bandrefam, Malacantha alnifolia was the most important species (55.14%).
- Observation In Bandrefam, Vitex grandifolia was an important species (18.43%).
- Observation In Bandrefam, Bosqueia angolensis was an important species (15.06%).
- Observation In Batoufam, Malacantha alnifolia was the most important species (28%).
- Observation In Batoufam, Polyscias fulva was an important species (22.73%).
- Observation In Batoufam, Psychotria sp. was an important species (21.28%).
- Observation The Bandrefam sacred forest had the highest tree density (2669 stems/ha).
- Observation Total carbon stock was 484.88 ± 2.28 tC/ha at Batoufam.
- Observation Total carbon stock was 313.95 ± 0.93 tC/ha at Bandrefam.
- Observation The economic value was 5858.04 ± 27.62 USD/ha in the Batoufam sacred forest.
- Observation The economic value was 3788.51 ± 11.26 USD/ha in the Bandrefam sacred forest.
- Observation Carbon storage: small-diameter trees and the number of individuals have little influence; medium-diameter trees store the most carbon and very large-diameter trees store less; wood density and basal areas influence carbon storage.