Claim · model-written summary
Meteorological factors influenced mean photosynthetic rate across stand densities by 52.1% for Aura DS.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Material
- Aura DSe0
- Outcome
- mean of photosynthetic ratee0
- Value
- 52.1e0
- Setting
- meteorological factorse0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The interaction of meteorological factors influenced the mean of photosynthetic rate across stand densities by 52.1, 67.1 and 73.6 % and the mean of transpiration rate by 63.3, 61.1 and 72.0 % for 'Aura DS', ' Barke' and 'Gustav', respectively.”
t0“barley”
Title
Dalia Janušauskaitė; Ona Auškalnienė; Dalia Feizienė; et al. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2013. doi:10.13080/z-a.2013.100.016
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Association Variety and stand density affected barley physiological parameters more strongly in wet than dry conditions.
- Observation Spring barley varieties differed in tolerance of meteorological factors.
- Association Barke had more intensive photosynthesis in dry weather.
- Association Gustav had more intensive photosynthesis in wet weather.
- Recommendation A stand density of 400 plants m -2 was optimal.
- Association Physiological parameters generally decreased as stand density changed.
- Association Meteorological factors influenced mean photosynthetic rate by 67.1% for Barke.
- Association Meteorological factors influenced mean photosynthetic rate by 73.6% for Gustav.
- Association Meteorological factors influenced mean transpiration rate by 63.3% for Aura DS.
- Association Meteorological factors influenced mean transpiration rate by 61.1% for Barke.
- Association Meteorological factors influenced mean transpiration rate by 72.0% for Gustav.