Claim · model-written summary
Furrow irrigation gave significantly greater mean cured leaves weight than drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- Burley tobaccot0
- Treatment
- furrow irrigatione5
- Outcome
- mean cured leaves weighte5
- Direction
- greatere5
- Value
- 5.8 vs. 5.2 ge5
- Comparator
- drip irrigatione5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Verbatim
e5“Overall, furrow irrigation significantly produced greater yield, mean cured leaves weight and IWUE as compared with drip irrigation (1.7 vs. 1.5 Mg ha-1, 5.8 vs. 5.2 g, 5.9 vs. 5.4 kg ha-1 mm-1)”
t0“quality of Burley tobacco under saline conditions”
Title
Maria Isabella Sifola; Youssef Rouphael Australian Journal of Crop Science 2015
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Soil electrical conductivity increased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water.
- Intervention effect Soil electrical conductivity increased more under drip than under furrow irrigation.
- Intervention effect Salinity of the irrigation water did not affect the yield of cured leaves in the SW2 to SW4 range.
- Association Quality of the cured product was generally depressed in the SW2 to SW4 range, associated with increased leaf Cl-.
- Observation Filling power of cut tobacco decreased in the SW2 to SW4 range.
- Intervention effect Furrow irrigation gave significantly greater yield than drip irrigation.
- Intervention effect Furrow irrigation gave significantly greater irrigation water use efficiency than drip irrigation.
- Intervention effect Drip irrigation was superior to conventional furrow irrigation for tobacco cultivation under open-field conditions.