Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soybean row spacing did not affect soybean yield unless narrowing the rows was combined with increased seeding density.

A claim from Candidate Tools for Integrated Weed Management in Soybean at the Northern Frontier of Production · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean row spacing did not affect soybean yield unless narrowing the rows was combined with increased seeding density.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Soybean row spacing (19 vs. 38 vs. 76 cm)e0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
unless the reduction in row spacing was combined with an increased seeding densitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management in Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57
e0

“Soybean row spacing (19 vs. 38 vs. 76 cm) did not affect soybean yield, unless the reduction in row spacing was combined with an increased seeding density (65% greater yield with narrow-row soybean seeded at 682,500 vs. wide-row soybean seeded at 455,000 seeds ha −1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1270–1538

Title

Candidate Tools for Integrated Weed Management in Soybean at the Northern Frontier of Production

Charles M. Geddes; Robert H. Gulden Weed Science 2018. doi:10.1017/wsc.2018.32

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e11c3dd70fc510092fc5b9a6445b5ab2f5095034dd32eff79deb4550352eddf6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 207 positive, 98 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

296 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.