Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tillage method had no significant effect on the number of fruits per plant (NFPP).

A claim from Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Crop Yield and Yield Components of Watermelon · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage method had no significant effect on the number of fruits per plant (NFPP).

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
tillage methode6
Outcome
NFPPe7
Direction
no significant differencese7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield Components of Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–84
e6

“tillage method significantly (P 0.05) affected crop yield, fruit weight (FW), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD) and total soluble solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–640
e7

“but there was no significant differences in other components such as number of plants per hectare (NPPH) and number of fruits 1 per plant (NFPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–786

Title

Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Crop Yield and Yield Components of Watermelon

Fereydoun Keshavarzpour http://www.idosi.org/ajps/6(2)13/9.pdf 2012

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-e11ef0fb75eaf588a7fcc409129a115a7376349c3ad0801d9b381952b92c4100 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.