Claim · model-written summary
Responses of Hoplolaimus spp. varied by treatment and site.
- Taxon
- organic zucchinit0
- Interactor
- Hoplolaimus spp.Hoplolaimuse0pest
- Outcome
- impact of integrating cover crops with bionematicides on other PPNe0
- Direction
- variede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The impact of integrating cover crops with bionematicides on other PPN, such as Mesocriconema spp., Nanidorus minor and Hoplolaimus spp., varied among the treatments at both locations.”
t0“organic zucchini”
Title
Effect of integrating cover crops and bionematicides on nematode management in organic zucchini
Denis Gitonga; Johan Desaeger; David Shapiro-Ilan; et al. Nematology 2025. doi:10.1163/15685411-bja10395
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Sunn hemp cover cropping significantly reduced Meloidogyne density at GCREC.
- Intervention effect Sorghum-sudangrass cover cropping significantly reduced Meloidogyne density at GCREC.
- Intervention effect At FLREC only sunn hemp reduced Meloidogyne population.
- Intervention effect Sunn hemp plus azadirachtin significantly lowered zucchini root galling by Meloidogyne.
- Intervention effect Sunn hemp plus neem oil significantly lowered zucchini root galling by Meloidogyne.
- Observation Responses of Mesocriconema spp. to the cover crop and bionematicide integrations varied by treatment and site.
- Observation Responses of Nanidorus minor varied by treatment and site.
- Association Bionematicide efficacy depended on nematode and cover crop species.
- Recommendation The authors recommend tailoring nematode control to damaging populations in each field.