Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In PF(A) in 2008, the 30 s/d developmental declination did not differ from 60 s/d in flowering (70.6% vs 65.9%).

A claim from Pursuing higher efficacy for managed photoperiodic initiation of sugarcane flowering in the tropics. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In PF(A) in 2008, the 30 s/d developmental declination did not differ from 60 s/d in flowering (70.6% vs 65.9%).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
developmental declinationse0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Value
70.6%e0
Qualifier
65.9%e0
Comparator
60 s/de0
Setting
PF(A)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74
e0

“In PF(A) in 2008, flowering from 30 (70.6% treated stalks) vs 60 s/d (65.9%) and 30 vs 45 s/d (77.1%) developmental declinations were not significantly different but was for the 45 vs 60 s/d declinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1209

Title

Pursuing higher efficacy for managed photoperiodic initiation of sugarcane flowering in the tropics.

N. Berding; R. S. Pendrigh; V. Dunne 2010

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e191132a2c9c2d401078dbb7ac94c6a61b613c19a726825a2fd389d12043a9b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer