Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization partially relieved wheat growth inhibition in amended soil.

A claim from Root‐mediated Allelopathic Interference of Nettle‐leaved Goosefoot (Chenopodium murale) on Wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization partially relieved wheat growth inhibition in amended soil.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
growth inhibitione0
Direction
partial amelioratione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only a partial amelioration in growth inhibition occurred upon charcoal supplementation or nitrogen fertilization in these amended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–695
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–116

Title

Root‐mediated Allelopathic Interference of Nettle‐leaved Goosefoot (Chenopodium murale) on Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

D. R. Batish; K. Lavanya; H. Pal Singh; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2006.00243.x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e1d357a070c1ae3ef7c9c3c022951e7d074401a9e6655991c5c7f99c6f5cd661 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.