Claim · model-written summary
The treatments did not change squash bee behavior.
- Taxon
- squashe1
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Interactor
- squash bee ( Xenoglossa spp.)Xenoglossae0pollinator
- Outcome
- squash bee ( Xenoglossa spp.) behaviore0
- Direction
- did not changee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“treatments did not change squash bee ( Xenoglossa spp.) behavior”
e1“squash ( Cucurbita pepo )”
Title
Jess Gambel; David A. Holway Ecology and Evolution 2024. doi:10.1002/ece3.11400
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Warming decreased squash flower size.
- Intervention effect Warming increased squash pollen production.
- Intervention effect Soil moisture limitation had uniformly inhibitory effects on squash reproduction.
- Association Honey bee visitation to male squash flowers increased with temperature.
- Association Honey bee visitation to female squash flowers decreased with soil moisture.
- Association Bee pollen deposition was independent of squash soil moisture.
- Intervention effect Reduced squash soil moisture increased pollen limitation.
- Association Squash seed set declined with increasing pollen-proxy pigment deposition from plants under reduced soil moisture.
- Mechanism The authors infer that transfer of lower-quality pollen under soil moisture limitation causes squash pollen limitation.