Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Defense gene induction after syringe-infiltrated bacteria was higher after morning inoculation in wild-type Arabidopsis but not in pcl1 plants.

A claim from Differential Control of Pre-Invasive and Post-Invasive Antibacterial Defense by the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defense gene induction after syringe-infiltrated bacteria was higher after morning inoculation in wild-type Arabidopsis but not in pcl1 plants.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
wild-typee3
Treatment
morning inoculatione3
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae3pathogen
Outcome
defense gene inductione3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
but not in pcl1 plantse3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arabidopsis Circadian Clock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–111
e3

“when bacteria are syringe-infiltrated into the leaf, defense gene induction is higher and bacterial growth is suppressed more strongly after morning inoculation in wild-type but not in pcl1 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–763

Title

Differential Control of Pre-Invasive and Post-Invasive Antibacterial Defense by the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock

Christin Korneli; Selahattin Danisman; Dorothee Staiger Plant and Cell Physiology 2014. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcu092

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e1ea1e2f06fc4c47b7755b3924b67c494965d290702e4d7025863c1fb910695f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer