Method / resourcemodel-written summary

The best model estimated infected spikelet number with MAE 1.56.

A claim from Fusarium head blight detection, spikelet estimation, and severity assessment in wheat using 3D convolutional neural networks · 2024

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best model estimated infected spikelet number with MAE 1.56.

Outcome
infected number of spikeletse0
Value
1.56e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our best 3D CNN models for estimation of total and infected number of spikelets achieved mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 1.13 and 1.56, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1294
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85

Title

Fusarium head blight detection, spikelet estimation, and severity assessment in wheat using 3D convolutional neural networks

Oumaima Hamila; Christopher J. Henry; Oscar I. Molina; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2024. doi:10.1139/cjps-2023-0127

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e22747975ad956372917687fd86f3df2e75ba27d4c3bc7b5323b9ca1ef63ed0a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer