Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under T8, radish plant height was the tallest, 32.84 cm, compared with 29.25 cm under T7.

A claim from Influence of Organic Amendments and Microbial Consortium on Growth and Yield Performance of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cv. Japanese White · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under T8, radish plant height was the tallest, 32.84 cm, compared with 29.25 cm under T7.

Treatment
80:60:60kg NPK + 10t FYM ha-1e1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
talleste2
Value
32.84 cme2
Qualifier
29.25 cme2
Comparator
Enriched compost 5t hae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Data aggregated over two years showed that T8 (80:60:60kg NPK + 10t FYM ha-1) produced Radish yields of 191.45q ha-1, while T7 (Enriched compost 5t ha) yielded 169.73q ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–871
e2

“The tallest plant height (32.84 cm), greatest number of leaves (16.31), longest leaf length (24.91 cm), widest leaf width (7.6 cm), and highest leaf area index (3.42) were observed in treatment T8, followed by 29.25 cm, 16.0, 22.73 cm, 7.35 cm, and 3.35 in T7, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1255

Title

Influence of Organic Amendments and Microbial Consortium on Growth and Yield Performance of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cv. Japanese White

Luna Barooah; Nandeesh J; Ruby Sharma; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2025. doi:10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i123920

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e27ec6c3da5554d35707cafd0aaccf75f42bd1592621e287f79ad58be20bd573 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.