Claim · model-written summary
Opposing dominance and dominance-by-dominance signs indicated duplicate epistasis.
- Outcome
- duplicate epistasise0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“disagreement signal indicate the existence of an act of the dominance h and dominance× dominance l of most studied traits duplicate epistasis”
t0“MAIZE”
Title
B. H. Hadi IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2016. doi:10.36103/ijas.v47i1.626
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Generations differed significantly across four crosses.
- Observation First generations had the highest trait means in four crosses.
- Observation FI01301 × Rustico showed 121.8% hybrid vigor for grain yield.
- Observation FI01301 × Rustico showed 126.92% heterosis for grain yield.
- Observation Additive, dominance and epistatic effects were significant in all crosses.
- Observation Dominance variance exceeded additive variance for ear length, grain weight and yield.
- Observation Complementary epistasis was reported for FI01301×Rustico.
- Observation Complementary epistasis was reported for AntignaoHi39×Nostred.
- Observation Complementary epistasis in grain weight was reported for Lo1391 ×Rustico.
- Recommendation Authors recommended reciprocal recurrent selection to improve yield and components.