Claim · model-written summary
The modified NMJ-model had similar performance to the J-model in estimating stomatal resistance on a seasonal average basis (RMSD 50.1 s m-1 versus 48.8 s m-1).
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“for a non-stressed maize canopy”
e2“the J-model and the NMJ-model had similar performance in estimating rs (r2 = 0.74, RMSD = 48.8 s m-1 for the J-model; and r2 = 0.74, RMSD = 50.1 s m-1 for the NMJ-model”
Title
S. Irmak; D. Mutiibwa Transactions of the ASABE 2009. doi:10.13031/2013.29219
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Method / resource Including the LAI term in the NMJ-model improved stomatal resistance estimates compared with the J-model, especially at higher resistance.
- Method / resource For partial canopy cover, the LAI term in the NMJ-model gave an 8% improvement in r2 relative to the J-model.
- Method / resource For partial canopy cover, the LAI term in the NMJ-model gave a 10% improvement in RMSD relative to the J-model.
- Method / resource Estimated stomatal resistance using leaf temperature rather than air temperature correlated very well with measured values, with a slight decrease in performance.
- Method / resource Using leaf temperature rather than air temperature decreased the performance of the J-model and NMJ-model by 17% in estimating stomatal resistance.