Claim · model-written summary
At 85 thousand plants ha-1, net benefit exceeded that at 55 thousand plants ha-1.
- Treatment
- 85e0
- Outcome
- net benefite0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- NRs. 1,06,692 ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- NRs. 79,249 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- 55 thousand plants ha-1e0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize hybrid”
e0“significantly higher net benefit (NRs. 1,06,692 ha-1) was obtained with 85 rather than 55 thousand plants ha-1 (NRs. 79,249 ha-1)”
Title
Economic analysis of maize hybrid influenced by tillage method and planting density
Thapa, S. B.; Shrestha, P.; Basnet, K. B.; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2019. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19478297
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect The B:C ratio was highest at 85 thousand plants ha-1.
- Intervention effect Rampur hybrid 6 gave higher net returns than Rampur hybrid 4, but the difference was statistically at par.
- Intervention effect Rampur hybrid 6 had a higher B:C ratio than Rampur hybrid 4, though statistically at par.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage gave better net returns than conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage gave a better B:C ratio than conventional tillage.
- Recommendation The authors recommend zero tillage at 85 thousand plants ha-1 for both hybrids.