Claim · model-written summary
Total hay yield and CPDM yield were significantly higher for the C treatment.
- Taxon
- Cassava and Stylo 184t0
- Treatment
- C treatmente2
- Outcome
- total hay yield and CPDM yielde2
- Direction
- significantly highere2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Cassava and Stylo 184”
e2“Both total hay yield and CPDM yield were significantly higher (p<0.05) for C treatment and lower (p<0.05) for SSSC treatment”
Title
Growth, Hay Yield and Chemical Composition of Cassava and Stylo 184 Grown under Intercropping
K. Kiyothong; M. Wanapat Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2004. doi:10.5713/ajas.2004.799
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Leaf area per cassava plant was significantly higher in sole crop than in intercropping.
- Association Total hay yield and CPDM yield were significantly lower for the SSSC treatment.
- Intervention effect CP contents at third and fourth harvests were significantly greater for intercropping than for sole crop.
- Intervention effect NDF contents were significantly greater in sole crop than in intercropping at the first and second harvest.
- Intervention effect Stylo 184 leaf area at first and second harvest was significantly greater for C, SC and SSC than for SSSC.
- Intervention effect Ash, CP and NDF contents of stylo 184 hay showed no significant difference between sole crop and intercropping, except at the first harvest.
- Intervention effect ADF and ADL contents of stylo 184 hay showed no significant difference between sole crop and intercropping, except at the first harvest.
- Intervention effect ADF contents were significantly greater in S and SC treatments than in SSC and SSSC treatments.
- Association Collective hay yield and CPDM yield of cassava and stylo 184 were significantly greater for the SSC treatment.
- Association Collective hay yield and CPDM yield of cassava and stylo 184 were significantly lower for the S treatment.
- Intervention effect Collective hay yield and CPDM yield were significantly greater for intercropping than for sole crop.
- Recommendation Two rows of stylo 184 to one row of cassava could be the optimal pattern for hay yield and CP production.
- Intervention effect Intercropping cassava with stylo 184 can improve foliage biomass yield and soil fertility compared with pure cassava.