Intervention effectmodel-written summary

LLIN reduced insect progeny production by 89-99% compared with controls.

A claim from Leveraging long‐lasting insecticide‐incorporated netting to improve fumigation efficacy against stored product insects · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LLIN reduced insect progeny production by 89-99% compared with controls.

Treatment
LLINe0
Interactor
stored product beetlese2pest
Outcome
progeny productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
89-99%e0
Comparator
insecticide-free netting and no-netting controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silos protected with LLIN showed insect dispersal and progeny production that was reduced by 83-99% and 89-99%, respectively, compared with insecticide-free netting and no-netting controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1250
e1

“uninfested wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–500
e2

“stored product beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–176

Title

Leveraging long‐lasting insecticide‐incorporated netting to improve fumigation efficacy against stored product insects

Sabita Ranabhat; Daniel Brabec; Madison Lillich; et al. Pest Management Science 2024. doi:10.1002/ps.8423

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e2ee355388a65071c1b23452c9766e8f9c83a4b996fbce95e991029c2a9776c9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

insecticide · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

trap barrier · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.