Claim · model-written summary
Surface drip at I 1.25 reduced yield by 20% versus flooding.
Oryza sativaNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield reductions of 15% in I 1.50 , 20% in I 1.25 , 29% in I 1.00 were observed for DI”
e1“were achieved as compared to CF”
t0“rice”
Title
Comparison of aerobic rice cultivation using drip systems with conventional flooding
Y. Bozkurt Çolak The Journal of Agricultural Science 2021. doi:10.1017/s0021859621000824
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Drip systems and pan coefficients significantly affected rice yield and yield components.
- Intervention effect Surface drip produced higher rice yield than subsurface drip.
- Intervention effect Conventional flooding produced significantly greater rice yield than both drip systems.
- Intervention effect The I 1.00 drip level saved 60.5% water versus conventional flooding.
- Intervention effect The I 1.25 drip level saved 54.5% water versus conventional flooding.
- Intervention effect The I 1.50 drip level saved 49% water versus conventional flooding.
- Intervention effect Surface drip at I 1.50 reduced yield by 15% versus flooding.
- Intervention effect Surface drip at I 1.00 reduced yield by 29% versus flooding.
- Intervention effect Subsurface drip at I 1.50 reduced yield by 20% versus flooding.
- Intervention effect Subsurface drip at I 1.25 reduced yield by 28% versus flooding.
- Intervention effect Subsurface drip at I 1.00 reduced yield by 44% versus flooding.
- Intervention effect Drip-irrigated aerobic rice had almost twice the water productivity of flooded rice under both water-input metrics.
- Observation DI-I 1.00 had the highest WP I values, 0.81–0.73 kg/m 3 across study years.
- Observation DI-I 1.00 had the highest WP I+P values, 0.85 and 0.74 kg/m 3 across study years.
- Recommendation The authors recommend DI-I 1.50 for sustainable aerobic rice production.