Integrated lime and FYM significantly improved maize performance.

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

136 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

1. negative
   Increasing P rates significantly decreased mycorrhizal spores associated with corn roots.

   Phosphorus Fertilization Impacts on Corn Yield and Soil Fertility · 2018

   Opposite direction

2. no effect
   Fertilizer nitrogen produced no yield response in corn grain, cob, and stover across seven site-years.

   First‐Year Corn after Alfalfa Showed No Response to Fertilizer Nitrogen under No‐Tillage · 2012

   Opposite direction

3. no effect
   Green manure did not significantly influence maize stover nitrogen yield.

   Effects of green manure legumes and their termination time on yield of maize and soil chemical properties · 2020

   Opposite direction

4. no effect
   Pre-sowing fertilization did not change the distribution of corn seeds compared with fertilization at sowing.

   PERFORMANCE OF CORN SOWING IN FERTILIZATION SYSTEM AND INTERCROPPING · 2018 · compared with at sowing

   Opposite direction

5. no effect
   Forage maize response to compost application was limited in both years.

   The Use of Vegetable- and Bio- Waste Composts: Effects on Forage Maize Production and Soil Properties · 2008

   Opposite direction

6. negative
   NPK did not produce a high increase in most maize traits.

   Effect of Nanofertilizers and Biofertilizers on Yield of Maize: Biplot Analysis · 2019

   Opposite direction

7. no effect
   Sulfur fertilization did not change corn grain or silage nutritive value.

   Alfalfa and corn response to sulfur fertilization on three Pennsylvania soils · 1984

   Opposite direction

8. negative
   Fortnightly fertigation at 1.5 kg/cm2 gave the lowest corn yield of 11.2 q/ha in season three.

   Cost-effective baby corn (Zea mays) cultivation under drip fertigation · 2014

   Opposite direction

153 papers more in this group

lime · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

1. no effect
   Gypsum did not improve corn response to N at either study site.

   Effects of Gypsum Application Rate and Frequency on Corn Response to Nitrogen · 2019

   Opposite direction

2. positive
   With lime, corn roots grew well even at the highest KCl level.

   The Effect of Soil Solution Aluminum and Calcium on Root Growth · 1959

   Same direction

3. positive
   Deep subsoil lime increased corn yields significantly in some cases.

   Results of Deep Fertilization and Subsoiling on a Claypan Soil¹ · 1960

   Same direction

4. positive
   Quarter lime requirement with 26.8 mg P2O5 kg-1 and 0.90 mg B kg-1 was recommended for maize in Nagaland acidic soil.

   Influence of lime, phosphorus and boron on performance of maize (Zea mays L.)in acidic soil of Nagaland · 2021

   Same direction

5. positive
   At 560 kg ha- 1 lime, corn recovered rapidly.

   COPING WITH SOIL VARIABILITY IN AN ACID, HIGH MANGANESE OXISOL · 1990

   Same direction

6. positive
   Lime at 1.0 t/ha produced 1.84 t/ha baby corn yield, on par with 0.5 t/ha.

   Influence of the best management practices on performance of dual-purpose baby corn (Zea mays) under eastern Himalayas · 2023 · compared with 0.5 t lime/ha

   Same direction

7. positive
   Gypsum biochar significantly enhanced maize performance across both seasons.

   Yield and Agronomic Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Municipal Organic Waste-Derived Biochar Amended with Vermiculite or Gypsum and NPK Fertilization · 2026

   Same direction