Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen deposition did not affect weed-to-rice shoot biomass ratio at 35/25°C.

A claim from [Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on competition of weedy species (Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis L.) and upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different air temperatures]. · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deposition did not affect weed-to-rice shoot biomass ratio at 35/25°C.

Taxon
O. sativaOryza sativae1
Treatment
Nitrogen depositione2
Interactor
E. crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie1weed
Outcome
shoot biomass ratio of E. crusgalli to O. sativae1
Direction
no impacte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had no impact on this ratio under 35 degrees C/25 degrees C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1198
e1

“shoot biomass ratio of E. crusgalli to O. sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1100
e2

“Nitrogen deposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1023

Title

[Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on competition of weedy species (Echinochloa crusgalli var. mitis L.) and upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different air temperatures].

Xian-Yan Yang; Qi-Qing Jiang; Jian-Jun Tang; et al. PubMed 2007

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e2f8a2a56f6d313addff3daa190af7eadec296b9b0853fc881c3abcc0d22e9f2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.