Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pod weight increased with the application of N and P.

A claim from Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on growth and yield of bambara groundnut. · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod weight increased with the application of N and P.

Taxon
bambara groundnutVigna subterraneat0
Treatment
application of level of N and Pe1
Outcome
pod weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
22.8 ge1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plant height (20.65 cm), leaves number (262), leaf area (2140.54 cm2), number of pod (47.25) and pod weight (22.8 g) increased with the application of level of N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–968
t0

“Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on growth and yield of bambara groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86

Title

Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on growth and yield of bambara groundnut.

Mahmudul Hasan; Md. Kamal Uddin; Mahmud Tengku Muda Mohammed; et al. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) 2019

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e326c0fedc6baba90da9fe388e23b43abc5c2b350f5395d45b4c3cf01838fa78 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.