Claim · model-written summary
The 3:l row proportion had benefit to cost ratio 2.06.
- Taxon
- sunflower
Helianthus annuust0 - Outcome
- benefit : cost ratioe0
- Value
- 2.06e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit : cost ratio (2.06)”
t0“sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”
Title
R.K. SARKAR; S. GOSWAMI; P.K. PAL Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v48i4.3093
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Sunflower growth and yield attributes and yield were superior under sole cropping.
- Intervention effect Pigeonpea growth and yield attributes and yield were superior under sole cropping.
- Intervention effect The 3:l intercropping row proportion improved sunflower growth and yield attributes.
- Intervention effect The 2:2 intercropping row proportion improved pigeonpea growth and yield attributes.
- Intervention effect All intercropping patterns exceeded sole crops for sunflower equivalent yield and income equivalent ratio.
- Intervention effect The 3:l intercropping proportion achieved the highest sunflower equivalent yield of 2,480 kglha.
- Observation The 3:l row proportion had land equivalent ratio 1.38.
- Observation The 3:l row proportion had product of crowding coefficient k 5.94.
- Observation The 3:l row proportion had income equivalent ratio 1.73.
- Observation The 3:l row proportion had gross returns Rs 19.840lha.
- Observation The 3:l row proportion had net returns Rs 10,212lha.
- Observation The 3:l row proportion had monetary advantage Rs 5,463/ha.