Claim · model-written summary
Cover crop herbage mass did not differ between species at Beeville in either year.
- Taxon
- cover cropse0
- Outcome
- Herbage masse0
- Direction
- not differente0
- Qualifier
- in either yeare0
- Comparator
- between speciese0
- Setting
- Beevillee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentValue
Verbatim
e0“Herbage mass of the cover crops was not different (P > 0.20) between species at Beeville in either year.”
Title
Integrating Cover Crops into Strip-Till Cropping Systems in a Semi-Arid Environment
Reagan L. Noland OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) 2014
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Cover crop and tillage did not interact with cutting regime for cotton and sorghum yields in either year.
- Intervention effect Cutting regime tended to reduce sorghum yield in the establishment year.
- Intervention effect Cotton yield did not differ among treatments in Year 2.
- Intervention effect Sorghum yield did not differ among treatments in Year 2.
- Observation Armadillo produced greater herbage mass in Uvalde in Year 2.
- Intervention effect Cover crop treatments did not affect target crop yields in Uvalde.
- Intervention effect Cut and removed cover crops increased cotton yield in Year 2.
- Intervention effect Cut and removed cover crops increased cotton boll count in Year 2.
- Observation Changes in soil nutrient status after cover cropping were inconsistent.
- Recommendation The authors concluded integrated strip tillage and cover cropping would not negatively affect yields in southern Texas, while further replication is needed.