Claim · model-written summary
Under different densities, maize line MC812 showed a 17.2-20.0% decrease in projected area compared with ZD958.
- Material
- MC812e4
- Treatment
- different densitiese4
- Outcome
- PJAe4
- Direction
- decreasee4
- Value
- 17.2-20.0%e4
- Comparator
- ZD958e4
Zea maysNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e4“Under different densities, MC812 and JNK728 showed 17.2-20.0% and 6.2-7.6% decrease in PJA, and 20.0-26.5% and 15.4-21.1% decrease in NVP compared to ZD958”
Title
Guangtao Wang; Guanmin Huang; Weiliang Wen; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jia.2025.05.011
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect At V9 stage, medium planting density increased maize plant side width by 7.2% compared with low planting density.
- Intervention effect At V9 stage, medium planting density increased convex hull volume by 11.4% compared with low planting density.
- Intervention effect High planting density increased maize plant side width by 4.2% compared with medium planting density.
- Intervention effect High planting density increased maize convex hull volume by 17.8% compared with medium planting density.
- Observation Similar changes in maize architecture were maintained at the V13 stage.
- Intervention effect At silking stage, the number of voxel volume per plant decreased by 6.2% from low to medium planting density.
- Intervention effect At silking stage, projected area decreased by 11.9% from low to medium planting density.
- Intervention effect At silking stage, the number of voxel volume per plant decreased by 4.9% from medium to high planting density.
- Intervention effect At silking stage, projected area decreased by 3.6% from medium to high planting density.
- Intervention effect Under different densities, maize line JNK728 showed a 6.2-7.6% decrease in projected area compared with ZD958.
- Intervention effect Under different densities, maize line MC812 showed a 20.0-26.5% decrease in voxel volume per plant compared with ZD958.
- Intervention effect Under different densities, maize line JNK728 showed a 15.4-21.1% decrease in voxel volume per plant compared with ZD958.
- Method / resource The support vector regression light transmittance model predicted bottom canopy light transmittance reliably.
- Method / resource The 3D canopy model simulated population light distribution with reasonable accuracy.
- Association NVP and PJA were identified as critical parameters affecting bottom canopy light transmittance in maize.
- Recommendation NVP and PJA are suggested as 3D selection indices for maize density tolerance breeding.