Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-till with straw retention increased the soil quality index by 11.3% versus rotary tillage with straw retention.

A claim from Soil quality associated with microbial community characteristics and dominant taxa across different tillage practices · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till with straw retention increased the soil quality index by 11.3% versus rotary tillage with straw retention.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
NTSRe0
Outcome
SQI indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.3%e0
Qualifier
0–10 cm soil layere0
Comparator
RTSRe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NTSR improved the SQI index by 22.4% and 11.3% higher than PTSR and RTSR, respectively, within the 0–10 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–699
e1

“maize yield under different tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–357

Title

Soil quality associated with microbial community characteristics and dominant taxa across different tillage practices

Wen‐Sheng Liu; Zhang‐Hua Zhu; Zhi‐Gang Lu; et al. Land Degradation and Development 2024. doi:10.1002/ldr.5249

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e45ff208f1c40307cfb3748125d8eeb19bd380230721fe9e58ce5bfb2ded43b9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.