Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Iron levels up to 10 kg ha -1 significantly increased no. of pods plant -1 (21.30) of groundnut over control and 5.0 kg Fe ha -1.

A claim from Impact of Different Sources of Nutrients on Growth and Yield Attributes of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron levels up to 10 kg ha -1 significantly increased no. of pods plant -1 (21.30) of groundnut over control and 5.0 kg Fe ha -1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Iron levels up to 10 kg ha -1e2
Outcome
no. of pods plant -1e2
Direction
increasede2
Value
21.30e2
Comparator
control and 5.0 kg Fe ha -1e2
Setting
Jobnere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted during kharif seasons of 2011 and 2012 at S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner to study the effect of integrated nutrient management levels on growth parameters and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–237
e2

“Iron levels up to 10 kg ha -1 also significantly increased the dry matter accumulation (59.8 g plant -1 ), branches plant -1 (19.08), dry weight of nodules (104.9 g), leaf area index (5.74), no. of pods plant -1 (21.30), no. of kernels pod -1 (1.61), pod yield (2461 kg ha -1 ) and stover yield (3868 kg ha -1 ) of groundnut over control and 5.0 kg Fe ha -1 but was found at par with 15 kg Fe -1 during both the years of study on pooled basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1448

Title

Impact of Different Sources of Nutrients on Growth and Yield Attributes of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Rajesh Chaudhri; Roshan Choudhary; R. S. Choudhary International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2017. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2017.8.1.1736

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e4770fb82dba59eedeebfc97a9a08a440eb08f65488599509cb1c0d2eb6067b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer