Claim · model-written summary
The single C-terminal non-LRR region polymorphism is not involved in L6-L11 specificity differences.
- Taxon
- flax
Linum usitatissimumt0 - Gene
- L6-L11e1
- Outcome
- L6-L11 specificity differencese1
- Qualifier
- single C-terminal non-LRR region polymorphisme1
Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The data show that the single C-terminal non-LRR region polymorphism is not involved in L6-L11 specificity differences”
t0“specificity in flax”
Title
Further analysis of gene‐for‐gene disease resistance specificity in flax
JEFFREY G. ELLIS; GREGORY J. LAWRENCE; PETER N. DODDS Molecular Plant Pathology 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00375.x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation L6 and L11 differ by 33 amino acids in flax.
- Observation Presumptive L1, L5, L8 and L11 genomic clones have confirmed resistance specificities by transgenic expression.
- Observation Polymorphisms necessary for L6-L11 specificity are spread throughout the LRR region.
- Observation Some polymorphisms essential for L11 are not essential for L6.
- Observation Seven null recombinants expressed no resistance when tested with CH5-derived rusts.
- Observation The null recombinant L6L11RV was resistant to rust strain Bs-1.
- Association L6L11RV recognizes a reduced number of AvrL567 variants compared with L6.
- Observation The L6L11RV specificity difference is not due to recognition of an unrelated Avr gene product in strain Bs-1.