Claim · model-written summary
Black fallow had 5.5 mm more moisture at 0–20 cm than the pea field at sowing.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- black fallowe0
- Outcome
- moisturee0
- Direction
- largere0
- Value
- 5.5e0
- Comparator
- field of pease0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By the time of sowing, a larger amount of moisture accumulated in the black fallow compared to the field of peas. It was 0–10; 0–20; 0–100 cm for 1.9; 5.5 and 20.6 mm, respectively.”
t0“Triticum Aestivum L. cultivation”
Title
Comparison of no-till and traditional technologies for Triticum Aestivum L. cultivation
A M Izotov; E N Turin; E L Turina; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2019. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/341/1/012087
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Black fallow had 1.9 mm more moisture at 0–10 cm than the pea field at sowing.
- Intervention effect Black fallow had 20.6 mm more moisture at 0–100 cm than the pea field at sowing.
- Intervention effect Spring productive moisture was similar under traditional and direct sowing systems, at 104 and 102 mm.
- Intervention effect Direct sowing did not significantly change soil density relative to traditional cultivation.
- Intervention effect Weed species composition did not change under direct sowing.
- Intervention effect Direct sowing improved soil structure, with a third-year coefficient of 4.05 versus 2.94 under traditional cultivation.