Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The Bacillus subtilis and B. pumilus consortium reduced damping-off incidence by 1.81%.

A claim from Field Based Assessment of Capsicum annuum Performance with Inoculation of Rhizobacterial Consortia · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bacillus subtilis and B. pumilus consortium reduced damping-off incidence by 1.81%.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Consortium of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumiluse0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Bacillus pumilusBacillus pumiluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence of damping offe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.81%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Capsicum annuum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–41
e0

“Consortium of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus reduced disease incidence of damping off by 1.81%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1010

Title

Field Based Assessment of Capsicum annuum Performance with Inoculation of Rhizobacterial Consortia

Manoj Kaushal; Priyanka Mandyal; Rajesh Kaushal Microorganisms 2019. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7030089

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e49d1a77c51ebbd63edbf69e7f388dc71cd9e73eabd793ae89b47606bdf0fff8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.