Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grafting reduced melon plant mortality in spring and fall experiments.

A claim from Grafted Melons: The Phytopathological Aspect · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting reduced melon plant mortality in spring and fall experiments.

Taxon
melonsCucumis meloe0
Treatment
Graftinge2
Interactor
Monosporascus cannonballusMonosporascus cannonballuse0pathogen
Outcome
plant mortalitye2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
non-grafted plantse1
Setting
spring and fall experimentse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of grafted and non-grafted melons of different cultivars to sudden wilt disease caused by the fungus Monosporascus cannonballus was evaluated in field trials conducted in the fall and spring growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1239
e1

“Significant differences in disease incidence were found among cultivars, between grafted and non-grafted plants, and between seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1373
e2

“Grafting reduced plant mortality in the spring and fall experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1442

Title

Grafted Melons: The Phytopathological Aspect

Roni Cohen; Yosef Burger; Menahem Edelstein HortScience 2004. doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.4.873d

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e4b9efef7d4254580ba05d963921fd9f6fb1000eebd317421f7e60ee46202142 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

grafting · Monosporascus cannonballus · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.