Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Boron application increased paddy yield in rice by 31% over control.

A claim from Effect of boron application time on yield of wheat, rice and cotton crop in Pakistan · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron application increased paddy yield in rice by 31% over control.

Treatment
B application before transplantinge0
Outcome
paddy yielde0
Direction
substantiallyincreasede0
Value
31%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B application before transplanting substantiallyincreased number of tillers hill-1 (21%), plant height (3%), panicle length (10%), and number of paddy grainspanicle-1 (17%), 1000-grain weight (11%) and paddy yield (31%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–953
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56

Title

Effect of boron application time on yield of wheat, rice and cotton crop in Pakistan

Riaz Ahmad; Muhammad Irshad DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2011

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e4f0e836acc42fcd69bd99db4b3a0049435c207c218d6c0441aa42a70e637503 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

boron atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

62 papers: 53 positive, 9 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this claim · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,069 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.